No matter who it may be, I’m sure everyone can recall a sentimental object they’re attached to for a specific reason. That object may be a photo shared with a loved one who passed away, or a cherished book that was often read as a bedtime story. Yet, what happens to these emotional attachments as more and more of our physical possessions become digital?
Left: an isle of music CDs in a shop; Right: Spotify’s home interface with various playlists (Credits: left, right)
It may initially seem counterintuitive to form an emotional connection with what is essentially a series of 0s and 1s.However, our possessions—both virtual and physical—are important components that we view as an extension of ourselves. The continuous curation process for these objects helps us explore our identity in a rapidly changing world. Think of the last time you created a Spotify playlist or posted an Instagram story—these micro-decisions accrue over time and become how we present ourselves to those around us.
There are several key differences between physical and virtual objects that have led to such a swift transition from the former to the latter. Most notably, virtual objects are immaterial, fluid, and more portable/accessible than their physical counterparts.
On the other hand, what’s generally emphasized as a benefit can become weaknesses when we consider its long-term effects on our perception of its value. Imagine how you would feel if your favorite photo became infinitely reproducible and only accessible on a digital device. It would feel like the photo is a lot less precious, right?
Left: a child laughing in front of the family photo wall; Right: browsing pictures via Google Photos (Credits: left, right)
As more and more of our thoughts, tastes, and personal lives are uploaded online, there’s also a growing desire that runs counter to that development. What’s currently happening isn’t a one-way street where the end goal is a complete digitization of our physical lives. In fact, we become starved over time for a physical link to things we love and hold dear. Think of the resurgence in CDs and vinyl records, or nostalgia-driven trends such as Polaroid cameras that print photos as you take them—distancing you from its digital form.
Now here’s the million-dollar question: how can we make designs that reap the advantages of digital products while keeping in mind the instinctive yearning users have for material possessions? There is no definitive answer to this. Nonetheless, it should be a question that designers often come back to as we tackle challenges that become more difficult with each day.
<aside> 💡
To learn more, check out the inspiration for this article: “Teenagers and Their Virtual Possessions: Design Opportunities and Issues” - William Odom, John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi [Link]
</aside>